Cell Relay Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: Sun sbus ATM and disabled_VC problem
In article <01bc541b$35174960$ba02b8cd@home-server>, Eddie Hoffman <edwinhof@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >The problem is that the Sun card only supports a limited range of VC >address's uhhh.. thanks. >the GIGAswitch will soon be able to re-set it's VC address range via the >cli (next version) we prefer the crude vxworks interface.. is there a known value that can be changed right now ? >or you could try using the ATMworks 350 or 351 (PCI based) cards that can >handle larger number and ranges. we have tried zeitnet ( almost fine, but watchdog resets ) adaptec ( the drivers timed out active VCs, and watchdog resets ) we have ATMworks 350 PCI in our digital unix 4.0 alphas, there is something wrong with CIP arps, and dec flow control, but they usually work. VesA > >Regards >Eddie Hoffman > > >vhalkka@cc.helsinki.fi wrote in article <5k26f7$ejv@alca.helsinki.fi>... >> Our Solaris 2.5 machines have trouble with SUNATM155 cards. >> >> WARNING: aar: detected disabled_VC problem on ba0 >> >> Is this a known problem ?? >> >> |
|