Cell Relay Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] RE: signaling changing routing tables
Hi Eike >A connection is being established from a source device across a privte >network where switches are connected via P-NNI to a destination device. >Will P-NNI signaling or routing part change the routing tables of a >switch? It is the responsibility of PNNI Routing to change the routing tables of a switch. Routing Tables are updated according to some well defined criteria at some regular intervals. PNNI Signaling just obeys the end to end optimal route to a destination while sending the SETUP message from the DTL in the SETUP. Thus the outgoing ports from each ATM device are obtained from this optimal route table which I think solves a doubt of urs w.r.t. one of ur previous mails. >And if, when (upon receiving a SETUP message, or ...)? Upon receiving s SETUP message PNNI Signaling just fills up the DTL according to the optimal route already obtained and just forwards the message through the outgoing CES specified in the DTL. Thus at this point there is no question of changing the route table of the switch, only the per port VPI VCI table is updated. >When are these routing table entries deleted again (upon receiving a RELEASE >message)? Or are routing tables entries not changed in connection setup >phase at all and I should think of them as beeing permanent physical >connections, that means predefined? As discussed above already the deletion of routing tables is independent of arrival of any RELEASE message for e.g. Routing table Generation is a constant background process. Any request of a connection setup just reads the routing table for generating DTLs (for source node )and updating the same (for entry border node ) in the SETUP message. Similarly a release request also modifies the per port VCI table at an ATM device which is nothing to do with the route table. Hope this clarifies. Regards Prabir Datta Future Software Private Ltd Madras, India >Thanx, >Eike > |
|