Cell Relay Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: Opinions about UNI 4.0?
In article <mchiuzk16o0.fsf@tove.tcm.hut.fi>, =?iso- 8859-1?q?Juhana_R=E4s=E4nen?= <Juhana.Rasanen@hut.fi> writes >As we already have a prototype of Q.2931 >it would be natural to go on with 4.0 rather than 3.1, but the problem >is that it would be nice to demonstrate interoperability with commercial >systems. UNI 4.0 spec doesn't state clearly how well it would work with >3.1, The implication of your statement is that Q.2931 and UNI 4.0 are compatible, but that Q.2931 and UNI 3.1 are not. Is this right? Alex Hardisty PQM Consultants, Suite C, 17 Moor Street, Chepstow, NP6 5DB, UK tel: +44 1291 626 180 / fax: +44 1291 626 190 email: alex@pqm-cons.demon.co.uk www: http://www.pqm-cons.demon.co.uk/ |
|