Cell Relay Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: Optical vs. Electrical Interfaces
Fahad A Hoymany wrote in message <6p1v8n$348$3@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>... >Hi, > > Our network provider says they cannot provide us with an optical >interface to their network. They can only give us an E3 electrical >interface. It looks like they have only E3 ports available to you, the user, or there are some regulatory/commercial reasons why they don't want to offer STM-1, or they have to carry you over a transmission system to you local Point of Presence (which my not be as close as you think...) The E3 is carried over fibre, to be sure, to you local exchange - but it sounds like it is then carried over SDH to the ATM switch. > We want an STM-1 interface (155Mbps) but it seems that Cisco >does not have electrical interfaces for that speedit only has optical >interfaces for STM-1. The questions are: > Do you need 155Mbps of bandwidth...? >1. Does it matter if you use electrical or optical STM-1 interface? Electrical STM-1 operates to a couple hundred metres (or even less, not too sure) over coaxial cable. It is a common interface on SDH line systems which are intended for intra-office use (office=exchange) >2. If they give us an electrical interface to their network, does that mean >the actual signal over the fiber link (into their network) is electrical? >Is it even possible that an electrical signal be carried over a fiber line? > I refer you to James Carlson's responses to these questions . >Thanks in advance >Fahad > Hope this helps, Kevin. |
|