Cell Relay Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: WinSock 2.0
Isn't that self-evident? Doesn't WinSock refer to Windows Sockets? Rommel P. Feria wrote in message <36A63BE1.38B1607B@ieee.org>... >If you are to use a UNIX server with ATM adapter that supports all the services, >then you don't need Winsock 2.0. =) |
|