Cell Relay Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1999-Jun> msg00116



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: ILMI address registration question

  • From: "ronald h. davis" <ronaldd@lucent.com>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:01:38 -0500
  • Organization: Lucent Technologies


albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com wrote:
> 
> In article <37691B54.67115CD9@lucent.com>,
>   "ronald h. davis" <ronaldd@lucent.com> wrote:
> >
> > i don't know that you need/want to require that the esi be equal to
> > a mac address when using e.164 format aesa's.  similarly, when using
> > private numbering plan (pnp) format there may also be no need/want
> > to have a "required" esi value since it is, in that case, a "private"
> > numbering plan.
> 
> Basically, Paul is saying that if you want to code up those ESI bits
> according to some sort of numbering plan of your own, vs. a flat MAC
> address, just set the G/L bit to "locally administered." Now you can
> set the rest of the 48 bits any way you please.
> 

what is the g/l bit?  i mean, i think that i get the idea that it is
to indicate global/local administration but where is it defined?

-- 
  __  ______  __  / __/ |       lucent technologies, naperville il, usa
_/ (_(_) / (_(_/_/_(_/  .       ronald.h.davis@lucent.com
author of "atm for public networks" published by mcgraw-hill
     http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0071344764