Cell Relay Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1999-Jun> msg00155



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: CR: what's the point of svp?

  • From: Vanicat Pierre <Pierre.VANICAT@synstar-international.com>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:13:27 +0200
  • X-Sender: Pierre.Vanicat@chambord.synstar-international.com

At 13:50 07/12/98 -0600, you wrote:
>uni 4.0 supports the ability to set up vpc's by signalling.  however,
>my question is, why would anyone want to do such.  it would appear to
>me that the reason for setting up a vpc is that you expect a lot of
>traffic between two points and once set up you would expect the vpc to
>stay up.  so it would seem to me that an svp might as well be a pvp
>which makes me wonder what do you really gain by being able to establish
>vpc's by signalling?
>
>-- 
>  __  ______  __  / __/ |       lucent technologies, naperville il, usa
>_/ (_(_) / (_(_/_/_(_/  .       ronald.h.davis@lucent.com
>"if you ain't the lead dog, the scenery never changes"  -- edmund wilson
>
Hello

   SVP can be use for Switched Permanent VP , VP who "look like" PVP at
both end, ( for the user )
   and which are realy SPV between the two end points

   So you can defined a PVP which can be rerouted in case of failure some
where in the network
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                  SynStar Computer Services International

 Pierre Vanicat                                   ZAC du Campus, Bat D
 Network Analyst                                  1 Avenue de l'europe
                                                31400 Toulouse, France

 phone : 33 (0) 5 61 00 31 61             Fax   : 33 (0) 5 61 00 31 62
 Email : pierre.vanicat@synstar-international.com                     
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------