Cell Relay Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: ATM vs. Frame Relay
Charles McCane schrieb: > > (...) > Today, large ATM networks rely on dynamic routing protocols such as PNNI > which is based on Dykstra's SPF algorithm. "Soft" PVC's and SVC's are > automatically rerouted when network failures occur. With our carrier ATM > switches, the reroute occurs much faster than with typical IP solutions such > that no data connections over the ATM network will time out. PNNI has no built in rerouting capabilities, has it? Nortel Passport for example uses standard OAM-cells to detect a failure and then initiates the PNNI-based setup of a new SPVC (if it is configured to do so). I think only vendor specific call routing protocols like Lucent's VNN may have rerouting features built in. Or have I overlooked something new? > (...) > FYI, a "Soft" PVC is nothing more than an SVC that is nailed up permanently. ... by operators and not by endsystems/users. Thomas Frieling (comp.dcom.lans.ethern is not reachable via my usenet access) > > -- > Charles McCane > Senior Systems Engineer > Lucent Technologies - Service Provider Networks > MCIWorldcom Account Team Dallas, TX.
|
|