Cell Relay Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: CR: Re: ATM vs. Frame Relay
Thomas and Charles, PNNI does have re-routing facilities (of course, for SPVCs and SPVPs only). Crankback and re-routing in the PNNI spec, I guess talk about this. VNN is not Lucent's proprietary, it is part of the specs. (VNNI and VUNI). Afroz Lateef Fujitsu Network Communications Thomas Frieling wrote: > Charles McCane schrieb: > > > > (...) > > Today, large ATM networks rely on dynamic routing protocols such as PNNI > > which is based on Dykstra's SPF algorithm. "Soft" PVC's and SVC's are > > automatically rerouted when network failures occur. With our carrier ATM > > switches, the reroute occurs much faster than with typical IP solutions such > > that no data connections over the ATM network will time out. > > PNNI has no built in rerouting capabilities, has it? Nortel > Passport for example uses standard OAM-cells to detect a failure > and then initiates the PNNI-based setup of a new SPVC (if it is > configured to do so). > I think only vendor specific call routing protocols like Lucent's > VNN may have rerouting features built in. Or have I overlooked > something new? > > > (...) > > FYI, a "Soft" PVC is nothing more than an SVC that is nailed up permanently. > > ... by operators and not by endsystems/users. > > Thomas Frieling > > (comp.dcom.lans.ethern is not reachable via my usenet access) > > > > > -- > > Charles McCane > > Senior Systems Engineer > > Lucent Technologies - Service Provider Networks > > MCIWorldcom Account Team Dallas, TX.
|
|