Cell Relay Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: ATM/SONET timing requirements
Jeff, My company actually uses an OC-12/OC-48 SONET backbone for our interswitch trunking. All of our core switches are timed off of a stratum-1 GPS clock, all edge switches reference the core for timing. So answer your question, Yes. This design has provided a reliable and acurate timing source for our network. I suppose the most stringent test for ATM would be AAL1 circuit emulation, this usually will show even the smallest slip in network timing, and has performed well on our network. <kroese@my-deja.com> wrote in message 85519h$rc0$1@nnrp1.deja.com">news:85519h$rc0$1@nnrp1.deja.com... > > > > The synchronization of long-haul digital networks is typically > accomplished using an external synchronization source, such as GPS, and > a hierarchical timing distribution system. Core switching sites are > timed to a Stratum 1 PRS, and are synched to lower level switching sites > and other nodes where there may be a Stratum 2 or 3 clocks. The Stratum > 1 clocks have a frequency stability of 10 to the minus 11 or better. > > Questions: As SONET speeds of OC-12 and beyond become more common, are > these timing distribution schemes still going to be sufficient, > particularly for ATM over SONET backbones? Does anyone know of timing > requirements for ATM over SONET which are going to force changes in > current network implementations? > > Jeff Kroese > > > > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ > Before you buy.
|
|