Cell Relay Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: PNNI-peer group size
tfrielin@my-deja.com wrote: > > Hello, > > to reduce the traffic generated by topology state packets the ATMF-PNNI > offers the possibility to split the routing domain into peer groups. How > large can peer groups get before their size causes problems? Of course > this depends upon the switch performance and the utilization of the links > but what are values typically used in real nets? Is it more like 5 of > like 50? I think the general feeling was the number would be somewhere from 50 to a couple hundred. That fits well with past practice for hierarchical networks. Experience would tell; perhaps the numbers could be larger if the network is reasonably well constructed. Certainly it shouldn't be much lower than 50; if a peer group of 50 doesn't work there's something wrong with the design that has nothing to do with PNNI... paul -- !----------------------------------------------------------------------- ! Paul Koning, NI1D, D-20853 ! Lucent Corporation, 50 Nagog Park, Acton, MA 01720, USA ! phone: +1 978 263 0060 ext 115, fax: +1 978 263 8386 ! email: pkoning@lucent.com ! Pgp: 27 81 A9 73 A6 0B B3 BE 18 A3 BF DD 1A 59 51 75 !----------------------------------------------------------------------- ! "A system of licensing and registration is the perfect device to deny ! gun ownership to the bourgeoisie." ! -- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
|
|