Cell Relay Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: Different IP/ATM Encapsulations
Hello, have a look at http://www.protocols.com/pbook/atmenca.htm Joern George Matey schrieb: > Paul Koning wrote: > > > > Kaushik Kuila wrote: > > > > > > Hello World! > > > I know about LLCSNAP and NULL ENCAPSULATIONS for transmission of IP datagrams > > > over AAL5. Are there any other common encapsulations for transmitting IP over > > > ATM ? > > > > It's really only the LLC/SNAP one. Null doesn't work for IP because > > you can't send InARP packets over the same VC then... don't know why > > it even appears as an option. > > Null certainly does work for IP; for PVCs, all you need is either a > static adjacency (user configured) or a forwarding implementation > which can correlate an IP subnet with a PVC and forward on that (both > cisco and Juniper support this). > > Why use Null? For those ISPs that used ATM as transport, some used > Null to get better throughput from their ATM links. > > -- > George > > > > > Another possibility would be to send IP packets in ethernet format > > over an Ethernet bridged encapsulation. That will show up if > > you're doing bridging. Apart from that, I wouldn't expect it; the > > LLC format is the main one. > > > > paul
|
|