Cell Relay Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:2001-Jan> msg00064



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Oldies question: switch VP or VC?

  • From: anouch_f@my-deja.com
  • Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:01:24 GMT
  • Organization: Deja.com
  • X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Jan 31 18:01:24 2001 GMT


Hi all,

I study a migration from ATM to MPLS and encounter a problem in MPLS
which leads me to ask a basic question in ATM. So I'll first ask the
question in ATM and explain the MPLS context which creates this doubt in
my mind.

Question: switching VPs instead of VCs is preferable in ATM because of
less overhead and is usualy done by big providers who don't want to
manage VC levels in their backbone. But in this case how an ATM switch
knows it must switch only on VPI instead of the couple (VPI.VCI)? In
other words, how to tell an ATM switch that it is a VP switch, not a VC
switch?

MPLS context: the label stacking in MPLS is similar to VCI/VPI switching
in ATM i.e. VPI is the outer label and VCI is the inner label. A LSR
(label switch router) switch only on outer label. But the push/pop
operation on labels is done always by an edge router (LER) who knows it
is an edge router (by configuration?).

What is the similitudes/differences between ATM and MPLS approches?

Many thanks,
Anouch


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/