The IP Over NBMA (ION) Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Integrated service does not scale over non-IP large cloud
In message <199606131047.TAA16032@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, Masataka Ohta wr ites: > As the debate on CSRs in ION ML seems to have stablized, the > below is an Internet Draft on why we must abandon NHRP. > > Any counter proof or other comments? > > Please reply to an appropriate mailing list. > > Masataka Ohta Rather than offer a counter argument I would like to point out that the same argument had been made as far back as the introdcution of NHRP to the ROLC WG wrt signalling implosion at a router serving a major portion of the non-ATM or non-"the-same-NBMA" portion of the Internet. The problem was never resolved and I do not even remember hearing a credible counter argument at all. This problem was simply ignored by the WG just as some tried to ignore route loop possibilities. Perhaps now that "large cloud" is no longer part of the WG name, the WG chair will see fit to officially sweep the problem under the rug. :-( (English coloquialism for ignore rather than address a problem). NHRP does offer a solution to the problem of "cut-through" with limited ability to scale, much like RIP offers a solution to the problem of routing with limited ability to scale. Both are poor general solutions but have applicability. It is unfortunate that this WG has been short sighted and unwilling to consider technical arguments that do not favor a predetermined direction. Curtis
|
|