The IP Over NBMA (ION) Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>ION Archive>month:1996-Jun> msg00134



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Integrated service does not scale over non-IP large cloud

  • From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
  • Date: Sat, 15 Jun 96 13:20:06 JST
  • Cc: kowens@tellabs.com, mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp, ion@nexen.com

Bert;

> For example, perhaps I-PNNI is going to be needed to solve the routing
> loop problems (I think it is).

> Perhaps the same type of approach will be
> needed here, to allow ATM large clouds to multicast IP intelligently.

To properly support RSVP, a lot more stronger similarlity is needed.

> I happen to believe that an ATM solution will be needed, simply because
> the IP solution itself is incomplete (for integrated services), as we've
> already discussed.

Make UNI/NNI an RSVP clone, make ATM and IP addresses mechanically
translatable, and so on.

It'll make ATM swiches eventual IP routers, save packet format.

The approach should be called "strong peer model".

Do you like it?

							Masataka Ohta