The IP Over NBMA (ION) Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>ION Archive>month:1997-Aug> msg00019



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Current state of RISP.

  • From: "Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@alpo.casc.com>
  • Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 09:03:40 -0400 (EDT)
  • cc: gja@dnrc.bell-labs.com, ogawa@flab.fujitsu.co.jp, ion@nexen.com

Ohta-san,

> Don't you think that the specification should be assigned formal
> values before it becomes an RFC, that is, while it is in an
> Internet Draft stage, which means the formal assgignment should
> be requested now?

Absolutely.  However, even if Jun sends in his request to iana
immediately following the Munich meeting, they can get backed up around
IETF time.  There is no reason why Jun cannot follow Grenville's
suggestion until the version number is officially allocated.

> Or, is it your point that the specification is defective not to
> be able to be an RFC?

I think that was uncalled for.

Regards,
Andy
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew G. Malis   malis@casc.com   phone:508 952-7414   fax:508 392-1484
Ascend Communications, Inc.        5 Carlisle Road    Westford, MA 01886