The IP over ATM Mailing List Archive by date

[gja@thumper.bellcore.com]

>>>(I'd like to go further and suggest that the ARP Server's behaviour
>>> is actually very impolite, but we'll leave that for a new thread.)
>>
>>Watch it on this one or you are going to get fired up.....<g>  And no,
>>please do not start a new thread.  I'd rather folks get back to 
>>talking about the multicasting solution and begin to think about
>>updates to the framework document.

Indeed. And I have other work to do :-)

>>I think the ARPServer issue/horse is beaten, dead, and pushing
>>up daisies.

I think it is the subsequent clarification of the LLC layer's existence
and role in multiprotocol VCs that is causing the problems.
I have this Monty-pythonesque feeling about the ARP Server - "Bring
out your dead!", "I 'aint dead yet! In fact, I'm ge'ing better!"
(Search for the Holy Grail, quoted with severe artistic licence)

	[..]
>>We'll discuss it again at a later time please.  Sound ok?

cheers,
gja