The IP over ATM Mailing List Archive by date

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1994-Sep> msg00190



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

one tcp per vc ???

  • From: Berry Kercheval <kerch@parc.xerox.com>
  • Date: Thu, 29 Sep 1994 15:50:18 PDT
  • CC: ip-atm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, kerch@parc.xerox.com

In message <29684.780769956@hplb> you write:
	
>I wonder what is the number of VCI per port supported in the switches
>available today?  And in the near future?  Granted, if every port 
>is going to provide 16 million VCI, there would be no need for 
>cause 45: "no VPCI/VCI available".  It exists because of the 
>reason I suggested.
	
There are switches available today, big expensive ones, that only support 512
VCs per port.  THere is a popular "little" switch that only supports 256 
(until the latest rev of the switch software).

This is indeed a REAL problem, especially in the PVC world.  Signalling will 
alleviate but not eliminate the problem.  Switches need BIG VC tables.  I 
mean, it's not like memory is expensive!