The IP over ATM Mailing List Archive by date

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1995-Apr> msg00032



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Multicast Servers and the required compromises.

  • From: Mark Laubach <laubach@terra.com21.com>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 10:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
  • CC: Andrew Smith <asmith@Baynetworks.COM>, ip-atm@matmos.hpl.hp.com, gja@thumper.bellcore.com

> Very. But this should not happen. Each MARS Cluster is considered
> a region between which IP multicast routers (not ATM multicast
> servers) pass/forward/replicate IPmc traffic. In the simple case
> a Cluster has the same scope as the underlying unicast LIS, and
> if you _really_ need ATM multicast servers in a given Cluster
> then that same mcserver must not register itself with any
> other Cluster.

Is "cluster" really an IP mcast term?...<g>

Mark