The IP over ATM Mailing List Archive by date

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1995-Apr> msg00053



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

draft-ietf-ipatm-encaps-00.txt

  • From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net>
  • Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 00:18:15 -0400
  • CC: asmith@Baynetworks.COM, ip-atm@matmos.hpl.hp.com


In message <9504260124.AA09171@protocol.atmsys.com>, Greg Hill writes:
> 
> Last year, I thought we agreed that our "long-term intention" was (as an opti
> on)
> null encapsulation. Doesn't that goal conflict with adding to IP-over-ATM an
> architectural reliance on the LLC layer? Or do unicast and multicast diverge 
> in
> opposite directions?
> 
> -Greg


I don't remember anyone deciding that.  Is that in the minutes of a WG
meeting somewhere?

Curtis