The IP over ATM Mailing List Archive by date

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1995-Feb> msg00099



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

RFC 1483 Thoughts

  • From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Feb 95 20:16:54 JST
  • CC: salo@msc.edu, ip-atm@matmos.hpl.hp.com

>     OK, flame off.  I would like to see us have a serious discussion about
> whether there's any way to viably reduce the number of ATM encaps options.
> (If not, so be it, but let's at least have the discussion).

Considering that no one can give conter-argument agaist the recent
discussion that IP architecture change is unnecessary for ATM, only
the ones which follow the practice of the current Internet should
survive.

I think LANE, which does not require any static configuration and
is broadcast capable, is good enough.

						Masataka Ohta