The IP over ATM Mailing List Archive by date[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [Q] Suggest new protocol providing QoS...
On Fri, 29 Mar 96 13:57:05 PST Fred Baker wrote: > well, I don't know. In the near term, let's say the next eighteen months, > what *other* traffic is likely to be on ATM? Well, IP is just as likely to be on ATM as any other traffic short term. ATM is certainly carrying non-IP traffic today (video, many protocols via LANE, voice) in many pilot networks. IP is not the only current or future user of ATM. > Yes, there are demos running H.310 on ATM, and there's always the rumor > that the folks that developed it, for voice, will start using it, And the folks that developed it are basically the ones that will be deploying it in the wide area and globally. I would think they would be deploying it for voice (and video since they want to get into that market) and data. I don't think they're going to be deploying it just for IP, or even mainly for IP. And if they don't deploy it then we are really talking about private ATM networks anyway, and in that arena IP is probably much more important (and there's more freedom to change the technology). > but in > the domain under discussion, to say that IP won't be an important player, > is, um, ... well, maybe a reality check? What I'm asking is: is IP significant enough to move the whole? In the current domain IP is (and I'm certianly partial to IP), but in the total ATM market, is it? This is not to say IP won't be important, but will it be important enough to be able to exert enough influence to change ATM and convince those folks who developed it, and who will hopefully deploy it, to incur extra cost and complexity in the network which they've already spent so much time thinking about. I'm not asking if IPs important to us; I'm asking if IP is important (enough) to the folks that developed ATM. My hope is really that it is, but I have some nagging doubt. When I see people state that "ATM must change" to better support some IP functionality, I can't help but wonder if such a desire is realistic. --- pete ------------------ Peter Schulter schulter@zk3.dec.com Digital UNIX Networking voice (603) 881-2920 Digital Equipment Corp voice (DTN) 381-2920 ZK3-03/U14 FAX (603) 881-2257 110 Spit Brook Road FAX (DTN) 381-2257 Nashua, NH 03062
|
|