The IP over ATM Mailing List Archive by date[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [Q] Suggest new protocol providing QoS...
>I'm not asking if IPs important to us; I'm asking if IP is important (enough) good question most market analysts now admit, though, that VOD is not likely to be i great demand (and anyhow if it is, the DAVI people have a far more cost effect set of technologies for delivrring it to existing POTS/Cable subscribers, which is a set of users that still outstrips Internet sbscribers by at least 1 order of magnitude) but my point on encapsulatint#g ATM in new NNI headers (suggestion for supporting IP multicast model scalably), is that if ATM can't do it, it is a good example of why IP is so succesful - the whoele Mbone switched from using loose source routing to IP in IP in the space pf a few weeks, and the whole Mbone is bigger than nay dfeployed ATM net (couting end sytems....easily...) if atm must change, it must change to become more flexible...or, as a manager of network change, and noting that this is the most complex and expensive element of management in any network, i would reject it as to inflexible.... jon
|
|