The IP over ATM Mailing List Archive by date

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1996-May> msg00212



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Maybe RSVP and Q.2931, but not NHRP

  • From: Sam Wilson <ercm20@tattoo.ed.ac.uk>
  • Date: 31 May 96 12:43:52 BST
  • cc: dhc2@gte.com, ion@nexen.com

>    Let me get this right: Juha is offering i-pnni as a substitute for r2r
>    nhrp?  Would hosts still use nhrp in that scenario?
> 
> to be more accurate, i said augmented pnni, which is not the same as
> i-pnni. augmented pnni would replace nhrp in the r2r case, since in most
> cases the routers either belong to the same ospf backbone area or they
> are runing bgp, in which case manual configuration is needed anyway.
> 
> for hosts, nhrp would be used as a replacement of cip.

I stand corrected - thank you.

Sam Wilson
Network Services Division
Computing Services, The University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, Scotland, UK