The MPLS WG Archive

[Tony Przygienda <prz@net4u.ch>]

> 
> Tony, since you threw the bait in the water...
> 
> Apologies to the ISIS wg, as this clearly isn't their issue. I think
> this is an important issue, if interoperability between the
> transmission equipment utilizing the wonderful IP control plane are to
> actually interoperate (which is a novel concept in some circles).
> 
> There is a relevant submission in the NSIF (NSIF-0009-038) which says
> "use PPP" and then hits on some of the TLI/TMN issues.
> 
> I'd suggest directing any further discussion of this topic to IPO 
> as it is within the current version of their charter.  They might be just
> as happy making sure that the right progress is being made somewhere, in
> this case, NSIF.

yepp, I think that was the intention of my e-mail. At least one reader
got the meaning between the lines.  We have charters to follow here ;-)

On the other hand, ISIS-wg has not been unheard of taking outrageous 
issues that had to be either done very quickly, didn't fit into any other
corner of the world or were in the danger of inertia induced death in 
other, slow moving forums ;-)  This one seems to me not being either (maybe yet ;-)

	thanks

	-- tony