The MPLS WG Archive

[Grenville Armitage <gja@dnrc.bell-labs.com>]

clarification to my post a few minutes ago - meant
to focus on the 2nd para of section 8.2:

Grenville Armitage wrote:
	[..]
> If section 8.2 simply pointed back to
    ^ "2nd para of.."
> the earlier discussion of AFxy<-->CLP mappings the text would be
> more self contained (and readers would be less likely to wonder
> if 8.2 is actually providing some further insight or normative
    ^ "2nd para of.."
> requirement over and above 4.2.2 and 4.4.2, which it does not).
> 
> That's a minor confusion easily avoided, either by removing 8.2
                                             "2nd para of.." ^
> or at least writing the text like "Only two possible drop precedence
> may be indicated by the CLP bit. Sections 4.2.2 and 4.4.2 define
> how three AFxy precedence levels [DIFF_AF] are mapped to these
> two values."

cheers,
gja