The MPLS WG Archive

[Adrian Farrel <AF@datcon.co.uk>]

Oops.  now sending the entire message!


This appears to bring RSVP into line with CR-LDP so that only one level of
label can be signaled.  

Label stacking is not prevented by this approach, it simply narrows the
options towards the commonly implemented ways of label stacking (for example
signaling down the tunnel).

Regards,
Adrian
--
Adrian Farrel  mailto:af@datcon.co.uk
Network Convergence Group
Data Connection Ltd., Chester, UK
http://www.datcon.co.uk/
Tel: +44 (0) 1244 313440  Fax: +44 (0) 1244 312422


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Laurel - Ganesh Murugesan 
>Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 2:02 PM
>To: Rahul Aggarwal; George Swallow
>Cc: mpls@UU.NET
>Subject: RE: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel-06.txt
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET]On Behalf Of Rahul
>> Aggarwal
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 5:07 PM
>> To: George Swallow
>> Cc: Rahul Aggarwal; mpls@UU.NET
>> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel-06.txt
>> 
>> 
>> George,
>> Thanks for the comments. I have a couple of inline comments:
>> 
>> Also I just realized that the new draft has limited the contents 
>> of the label
>> object to a single label, rather than a stack of labels. What is 
>> the reason
>> for this limitation? 
>> 
>
>====> But Section 1.1 Background 2nd paragraph says 
>      "Label stacking is also supported."
>
>thanks
>ganesh
>