The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Jul> msg00424



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

your mail

  • From: Bora Akyol <akyol@pluris.com>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:05:20 -0700
  • CC: mpls@UU.NET

Of course in multicast, the receiver is the one that initiates the join if you will.
Seeing that a sender will have no notice of who its receivers are until the join has occurred.

Bora


Steven Berson wrote:

> On Thu, 27 Jul 2000 Ted44tedT@netscape.net wrote:
>
> >   I have several questions about the RSVP and RSVP-TE:
> >
> >   If a host want a resource reservation, it should send Resv message toward
> >   the sender first, right? and then the sender send back Path
> >   message back ,right?
>
> This is not correct.  In RSVP the sender first sends a PATH message.
> Then the receiver sends a RESV message.
>
> The PATH message serves as an announcement of the sender being ready
> to source data.  It also provides the proper route of the data which
> the RESV message follows back to the source.  Finally, the PATH
> message provides an ADSPEC which has information about the quality of
> service the receiver can reserve.
>
> >   But in RSVP-TE(06.txt), the sender should send the Path message first toward the receiver,
> >   and then the receiver send back the Resv message. When the sender receive the Resv msg,
> >   the LSP is setup.
> >
> >   I think the RSVP is a receiver-oriented protocol, so the receiver should send the Resv msg
> >   first toward the sender in the RSVP-TE(06.txt) to setup the LSP.
> >
> >   I know I was confused by some points. But I don't know where.
> >
> >   Sincerely,
> >   Ted



  • References:
    • your mail
      • From: Steven Berson <berson@isi.edu>