The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] your mail
Of course in multicast, the receiver is the one that initiates the join if you will. Seeing that a sender will have no notice of who its receivers are until the join has occurred. Bora Steven Berson wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jul 2000 Ted44tedT@netscape.net wrote: > > > I have several questions about the RSVP and RSVP-TE: > > > > If a host want a resource reservation, it should send Resv message toward > > the sender first, right? and then the sender send back Path > > message back ,right? > > This is not correct. In RSVP the sender first sends a PATH message. > Then the receiver sends a RESV message. > > The PATH message serves as an announcement of the sender being ready > to source data. It also provides the proper route of the data which > the RESV message follows back to the source. Finally, the PATH > message provides an ADSPEC which has information about the quality of > service the receiver can reserve. > > > But in RSVP-TE(06.txt), the sender should send the Path message first toward the receiver, > > and then the receiver send back the Resv message. When the sender receive the Resv msg, > > the LSP is setup. > > > > I think the RSVP is a receiver-oriented protocol, so the receiver should send the Resv msg > > first toward the sender in the RSVP-TE(06.txt) to setup the LSP. > > > > I know I was confused by some points. But I don't know where. > > > > Sincerely, > > Ted
|
|