The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] RSVP-TE--RRO
Hi again Julia, In this case "must" applies to "if present" and does not mean "must always be present". RRO is optional in a Resv but must be present in response to a Path that contains RRO. see section 4.4 Regards, Adrian -- Adrian Farrel mailto:af@datcon.co.uk Network Convergence Group Data Connection Ltd., Chester, UK http://www.datcon.co.uk/ Tel: +44 (0) 1244 313440 Fax: +44 (0) 1244 312422 >-----Original Message----- >From: Hong Liao [mailto:hliao@telcordia.com] >Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 9:56 PM >To: mpls@UU.NET >Subject: RSVP-TE--RRO > > > > >Hello, > >On Rsvp -TE page 17 the latest version 07.txt, it says that >"In resv message, >they must appear after the associated FILTER_SPEC and prior to the say >subsequent FILTER_SPC". > >I understand that the LABEL object should be in RESV message, >but in Resv >message, in either case of FF and SE, the [<RECORD_ROUTE>] is >optional. Also it >is optional in Path message. > >So RRO in Resv is optional or not? > >Thanks, > >Julia > > |
|