The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2001-Apr> msg00238



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

WG Last call : Comment on COS service and TSPEC

  • From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@workhorse.fictitious.org>
  • Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:31:03 -0400
  • cc: Sandeep Sharma <ssharma@irislabs.com>, David Charlap <david.charlap@marconi.com>, lberger@movaz.com, swallow@cisco.com, mpls@UU.NET, bsd@cisco.com, liwwu@europe.cisco.com, pasi.vaananen@nokia.com, ram64@lucent.com ('Ram Krishnan'), Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com (Shahram Davari), Pierrick.Cheval@alcatel.fr, jh@lohi.eng.telia.fi


In message <200104171235.OAA19938@cisco.com>, Francois Le Faucheur writes:
> --=====================_22843789==_.ALT
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> Sandeep and all,
> 
> At 11:17 08/03/2001 -0600, Sandeep Sharma wrote:
> >Francois,
> >
> >Your suggested changes are good!
> >
> >One comment: I think, in the context of E-LSP and L-LSP, there is a need to
> >clarify use of the RSVP DCLASS object (RFC 2996) as referenced in the NULL
> >service.
> >
> 
> How about adding the following clarifying statement (in section 5.6, which
> will
> be reworded to talk about Null service)?
> 
> Note also that this specification does not concerned itself with the DCLASS
> object defined in [DCLASS], since this object conveys information on DSCP
> values, which are not relevant inside the MPLS network.=20
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Francois


That seems accurate and should cover it.

Curtis