The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Does anyone know any article on advantage/drawback comparison between RSVP-TE and CR-LDP?
Hi, As everybody already recommended DataCommunications, here is two others, one from Cisco (so very RSVP oriented). Anyway, maybe of some use. http://www.telecommagazine.com/issues/200011/tcs/signaling_in_mpls.html http://www.telecommagazine.com/issues/200011/tcs/cd-ldp_for_value.html Rob Gang Luo <gluo88@hotmail.com> on 04/14/2001 10:09:09 AM To: mpls@UU.NET cc: junchen@site.uottawa.ca (bcc: Robert Streijl/Telcordia) Subject: Does anyone know any article on advantage/drawback comparison between RSVP-TE and CR-LDP? Hi, Does anyone know any article on advantage/drawback comparison between RSVP-TE and CR-LDP? We may prepare such a comparation article if there does not exist such one. the intial list of the drawbacks of compared with CR-LDP compared with RSVP-TE UNI ----------------------- * not so flexible to change the path properties once it was setup since there is not referesh mechanism. * ...? the intial list of the drawbacks of RSVP-TE UNI, compared with CR-LDP ----------------------- * there is no flow control, which results the waste of resources. * per-path based refreshment overhead, it is very substatial for big carriar networks. * message sized is limited by IP packet size, which may not be big enough for certain query services. * ....? Your help will be greatly appreciated. Best regards. Gang Luo. |
|