The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re:
John Wysocki wrote: > > I have very high level generic MPLS TE questions to ask. If you > could help me on it, I'll appreciate very much. > > 1) It's my understanding LSPs are usually within an AS and not > inter-AS. Is this correct? This is how they will typically be used. There are explicit-route subobjects in RSVP-TE and CR-LDP for specifying AS numbers as hops along an LSP. It is theoretically possible for a single LSP to cross AS boundaries. But in actual practice, you will probably not see much of this. Mostly for political, security and business reasons. > 2) BGP-TE is really not well defined yet, right? There are drafts in progress for this. > 3) Is multicast well defined in MPLS? There are drafts in progress for this. > 4) Only GMPLS defineds bi-directional LSPs, but ISIS usu takes > links as bi-directional but MPLS tunnel is not. Does anyone > know how to handle this situation? I don't see what the problem is. Knowing that a link is bidirectional doesn't force you to signal bidirectional LSPs on it. No more than it would (somehow) force the existance of bidirectional traffic over a link in a non-MPLS network. -- David
|
|