The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] I-D updates posted
Cheenu,
Tom asked me to remind you guys about the following points when the MIBs
returned from IESG review!
------
Hi,
I've just noticed the following object in TE-MIB:
mplsTunnelExcludeAllAffinity OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX MplsTunnelAffinity
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A link satisfies the exclude-all constraint if and
only if the link contains none of the adminstrative
groups specifie in the constraint."
REFERENCE "RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP
Tunnels, draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel-07.txt"
::= { mplsTunnelEntry 29 }
>From the description and the name of the corresponding field in the RSVP
SESSION_ATTRIBUTE (LSP_TUNNEL_RA) object, shouldn't this really be called
mplsTunnelExcludeAnyAffinity?
Ed
PS There also seem to be a few typos in the description - "adminstrative"
and "specifie".
------
-----Original Message-----
From: Cheenu Srinivasan [mailto:cheenu@paramanet.com]
Sent: 19 December 2001 18:09
To: mpls@UU.NET
Subject: I-D updates posted
The following I-D updates have been posted and should appear on
the IETF website shortly. Copies are attached to this email for
reference.
1. draft-ietf-mpls-tc-mib-03.txt
2. draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-mib-08.txt
3. draft-ietf-mpls-te-mib-08.txt
4. draft-ietf-mpls-ftn-mib-04.txt
All these documents are currently in IESG review and the updates
are based on the feedback from this process.
These versions of the MIBs are aligned with each other and have
been verified to compile with smilint. (In the TC MIB you will
need to replace the xxx in { transmission xxx } with a number
like 166 before attempting to compile the lot.)
An update to the LDP MIB I-D aligned with this version of the TC
MIB may be posted shortly by its authors.
Cheenu
|
|