The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2001-Feb> msg00188



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Question to draft-ietf-mpls-diff-te-ext-00.txt

  • From: "Daniel N. Bauer" <dnb@zurich.ibm.com>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:20:02 +0100
  • Organization: IBM Research

Hello,

draft-ietf-mpls-diff-te-ext-00.txt describes the
handling of the RSVP CLASSTYPE Object.
Is it correct to say that for E-LSPs, the CLASSTYPE
object should be omitted, since a single E-LSP might
be associated with multiple class types? But then,
omitting a CLASTYPE object automatically associates the
LSP with CLASTYPE 0?!?
Is omitting the correct behaviour?

Thanks,

-Daniel