The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2001-Jan> msg00295



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Last call on MPLS TE MIB

  • From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>
  • Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:01:47 -0500
  • Cc: <slakkapr@nortelnetworks.com>, <mpls@UU.NET>


>#         I would also change the SYNTAX to Unsigned32.
>#The use of "INTEGER" is appropriate for enumerations.
>#Will Unsigned32(0..63) satisfy the definition from
>#the CRLDP specification? I think that we want to just
>#leave this as Unsigned32 without the range.
>
>Mani> The range was specified since only 6 bits of
>the 1 byte Flags can be set. The 2 Most significant Bits
>are reserved, set to zero on transmission. (Ignored on
>reception).
>
>If range is not specified, in the implementation we
>need to take care of the value being set with the
>appropriate values.

         Okay, then we can leave it as an Unsigned32
value with the range. You should also include the above
textual description in the suggested description I
requested.

         --Tom