The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Doubts about MPLS-TE Mib
Arpatim Mukherjee, You Asked....*1. There are three similar objects in the mplsTunnelTable .... *mplsTunnelIndex , mplsTunnelInstance , mplsTunnelPrimaryInstance . *According to my understanding , mplsTunnelIndex is the same as the TunnelId *in the Session object . * But how does mplsTunnelInstance and mplsTunnelPrimaryInstance fit into *RSVP-Te ? * Are they outside the scope of RSVP-Te ? * Or do they refer to LspIds of primary and secondary Lsps ? If you are using RSVP-TE,you can have the following mapping: 1) mplsTunnelIndex -> Tunnel ID carried by RSVP 2) mplsTunnelInstance -> LSP ID carred by RSVP mplsTunnelPrimaryInstance can be the LSP ID of the primary tunnel. They are very much in scope with RSVP-TE You asked.... 2. the object mplsTunnelIngressId is defined to be used as the I beleive it can be the same as the TunnelIngressID You asked...
ARHopTable records the actual route taken by the LSP,which may be different from the specified one and CHopTable contains entries which are populated with CSPF Calculated paths. However both these tables are optional,if you dont have the RRO support in signaling and CSPF Module to have Constraint based SPF's. Regards, Abhay
|
|