The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Some queries about MPLS implementation
"N.Suresh" wrote: > Hi all, > I am implementing the LDP on linux.. > i have some queries. > > (1) The Hello Message send on as multicast on a Multicast socket. Suppose > > that after adjacency discvery a connection is established between the > two machines. Furthor LDP message transmission is going on the TCP > socket. To identify the link usage we want again tranceive Hello > message. I have the doubt that which socket we want to be use for the > Hello message, whether the multicasted socket or the TCP socket. Hello messages continue to be sent using UDP. > > > (2) If the next hop has changed, and I have sent Label Abort msg to that > hop. Will it be reach at there?. Then what is the significance of the > Label Aborted message? Two issues here: lost contact with next hop LDP peer and simple change in routing resulting in a next hop change relative to a FEC. In the first case - where the Label Abort message would not be able to reach the peer - the Label Abort is not indicated; you would instead purge all state relative to this LDP peer, including any state relative to Label Requests. In the latter case, the Label Request Abort accelerates the process of making labels and other LSP resources available in downstream LSRs when it is found that this particular portion of the LSP is not needed. > > > (3) The Address message is used to send the Interface message to the next > hop. But the Address Family field of the Address message tells the > address types are either IPv4 or IPv6. What is it. Correct. > > > (3.1) Is it a string value?. Actually interface address is a 48 bit address > of the > interface. > (3.2) So how it can be either IPv4 or IPv6?. Formats for these are explicitly defined in the specification (RFC 3036). > > (3.3) The interface address are taken care by the Link Level Layers. > So what is the need for the LDP to care by the interface address. > One of the ans. is to identify the link through which the Hello > msg. is comming. LDP needs to know what next hop addresses it may know an LDP peer by through other means. This is needed in order to allow the LSR to bind labels received on an upstream interface to corresponding labels distributed for a FEC from an LDP peer that is the routing next hop. > > > anybody has any idea? > > thanx in advance > regards > > -- > !============================================================================! > = Suresh N., Research Engineer, C-DoT, Bangalore. = > = Call me at : OFF: 2383951(Dir) / 2263399 (268) = > = RES: 3334248 MOBILE: 98441 77782 = > = Alternate email : nsur_mys@email.com = > = QOT: For fast-acting relief, try slowing down. > !============================================================================! > >
|
|