The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2001-Jul> msg00495



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

LSP utilization

  • From: Eric Osborne <eosborne@cisco.com>
  • Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 18:54:29 -0400
  • Cc: Christian Kuhtz <ck@arch.bellsouth.net>, mpls@UU.NET
  • User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.13i
  • X-GPG-Fingerprint: 6412 0836 E440 B3EA 980C 4951 611E 1819 2E71 8562

On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 04:02:37PM -0400, Raymond Law wrote:
> So has anyone looked into increasing the efficiency of LSP usage in a MPLS 
> domain or is there any solution already out there?
> 

Define "efficient".  Then we can start talking about what the problem
may be, whether it needs to be solved, and how to solve it.



eric

> Thanks.
> Ray,
> 
> At 03:58 PM 7/28/01 -0400, you wrote:
> 
> >Of course there is.  It's called 'real world'.
> >
> >TE is a tool, but not everything in the world (or anywhere near to that) is
> >always TE'ed.
> >
> >Any notion that MPLS LSP utilization is always efficient is ridiculous.
> >
> >On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 03:51:08PM -0400, Raymond Law wrote:
> > > What is the utilization of LSPs in a real MPLS domain?  It seems that the
> > > LSP utilization should be efficient since the LSPs are configured as such
> > > by traffic analysis and administrative means.  Is there a situation in
> > > which a LSP is overutilized and another LSP may be underutilized?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > Ray,
> > >
> >
> >--
> >Christian Kuhtz <ck@arch.bellsouth.net> -wk, <ck@gnu.org> -hm
> >Sr. Architect, Engineering & Architecture, BellSouth.net, Atlanta, GA, U.S.
> >"I speak for myself only.""