The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2002-Jun> msg00148



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

MPLS TE MIB Doubt

  • From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 10:54:19 -0400
  • Cc: "'mpls@uu.net'" <mpls@UU.NET>, "'cheenu@paramanet.com'" <cheenu@paramanet.com>, "'arun@force10networks.com'" <arun@force10networks.com>



>         In MPLS-TE mib, it is written that the information necessary to
>build entries within mplsTunelARHopTable is not provided by some MPLS
>signaling protocols and therefore the implementation of this table is
>optional. RSVP-TE has the RRO mechanism but CR-LDP don't have such kind of
>mechanism.
>Is it fine if one uses Path Vector information to build this table
>in case of CR-LDP ?
>
>Does this mean that this table is not applicable to CR-LDP ?

         We were aware of the fact that some implementations
could not build the actual route information, thus we made the
table optional.

         --Tom




------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.