The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2002-Oct> msg00096



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

FW: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mpls-tc-mib-04.txt

  • From: "Yuan Gu" <YuanGu@ipinfusion.com>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:56:37 -0700
  • Cc: "mpls group" <mpls@UU.NET>
  • Importance: Normal


>Although, it may be necessary to clarify this a tad, I don't
>believe there is a conflict.  Perhaps, this description
>should simply state:
>For RSVP, the MplsLSPId is the "LSP ID" as defined in RFC3209.

Then for RSVP-TE, what's the sense to define LSP ID in XC table? This two
bytes LSPID can't identify an unique LSP. Don't need to mention transit
node, even within single ingress node it's not unique right?