The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2003-Feb> msg00081



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

draft-meyer-mpls-soft-preemption-00.txt

  • From: Ina Minei <ina@juniper.net>
  • Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:13:02 -0800 (PST)
  • cc: "Nguyen, An" <nguyena@ncs.gov>, "'Jim Boyle '" <jboyle@pdnets.com>, "'Matthew Meyer '" <mrm@gblx.net>, "'mpls@UU.NET '" <mpls@UU.NET>


>
> As a practical matter, I don't think there would be other traffic that
> would be preempting "authorized emergency preparedness" traffic for
> Federal, state, and local.

	Agreed. However, think of the scenario where you want to move away
traffic from particular links for a maintenance window. In that case, even
this high priority LSP would have to be preempted.

				Ina

>
> The soft preemption helps the traffic which is being preempted.
>
> AFAIK "authorized emergency preparedness" traffic is not being
> selectively signaled and queued at all in ISP networks.
>
> Curtis
>