The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: REG: MPLS on Cisco routers.
Hi, The 2600 supports all of the features that you mentioned (MPLS VPN/OSPF from CE-PE/MPLS TE with IS-IS (all assuming for example 12-1-7JS)), but does not support some features that the 7200 does. For example, if memory serves me right, the 7200 (& up) support MPLS TE with OSPF in the current IOS (2600/3600 do not). Additionally, capacity & throughput would be concerns if you were considering the deployment of 2600 as PEs. Of course it depends on the size of your mpls network, but 2600s might be best suited for use in the lab (as far as mpls is concerned). Mark Lewis >From: "Vinod Anthony Joseph Cherunni" <vac@dsqworld.com> >To: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com >Subject: REG: MPLS on Cisco routers. >Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:58:00 +0530 > >Dear All, > >I have been struggling a bit to get information on what features in regard >to MPLS VPN deployments are supported on what Cisco routers. > >What are the additional features that are available on the Cisco 7206 >series as compared to the Cisco 36xx series from an MPLS VPN perspective. >When would I choose the Cisco 7206 as against the 36xx in an MPLS >deployment. I do understand that the Cisco 7206 is a bigger guy supporting >a wide variety of interfaces, & is ideal for core deployment. But from an >MPLS feature perspective, what could be difference between the two. > >Can a 26xx be deployed as an MPLS PE device with the following - > >1. Complete support for the MPLS VPN. > >2. OSPF PE-CE routing support > >3. Capable of Traffic engineering using RSVP. > >Kindly pls advise me. > >With warm regards, >Vinod. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml |
|