The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2001-Apr> msg00155



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: RE: doubt in RFC 3031

  • From: "Bhupesh Bajaj" <mpls@indiatimes.com>
  • Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 16:22:57 +0530
  • CC: <mpls@uu.net>, <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
  • Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 08:26:39 -0400
  • To: <alexander@marhold.at>
  • X-URL: http://indiatimes.com

hello,

as far as i believe the penultimate hop is going to behave in same way ( as far as number of lookups is concerned )in both cases with / without using this technique.."penultimate hop popping"..

so i believe it needn't be mentioned in RFC that with PNP one gets the benifit of just one lookup from penultimate hop side also as they have mentioned in RFC

waiting for comments,


thanks and regards,
bhupesh

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml