The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: MPLS VPNs interconnection
karl, Ok so you are saying that "true VR" :) will be able to interonnect L2 & L3 VPNs at the SP side. The only problem is that routers make their forwarding decision based on the L3 and above while TLS service may not even have IP L3 in the frames it transports between customer sites via SP. Besides I find this interesting that you have a set of potential customers who want to terminate TLS on a VR or any router in general - usually those I talked to want to put low cost LAN switches in the remote sites to simplify network design or cut costs. R. > Karl Garcia wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > My read on the question, and perhaps Chrysostomos could clarify, was > the interconnection > of VPN technologies. He then went on to list several of those > technologies and layer > 2 MPLS was only one of a list of several. You can see in my reply > that I talked about > interconnection for the various VPN technologies today and support for > layer 2 VPNS > in the near future. > > It seems to my understanding that L2 and L3 VPNS could easily > interconnect at the SP > if there was a full router (e.g. a Virtual Router) acting as the > connection point. L2 VPNS are > either point to point (which is only marginally interesting and > certainly not scalable) > or point to multi-point using Transparent LAN Services (TLS). > (Imagine the SP network acting > like a transparent bridge for the enterprise's L2 network). In this > case, since we > have a full virtual router at our service, the L3 connections would > look like just another > endpoint. Since this feature is not yet released, I am not going to > make any claims, > but I see no reason that a Virtual Router at the SP could not > interconnect L2 and L3 VPNs. > > Think of it this way: if a SP provided and maintained a dedicated > router for each > customer, would they be able to perform this service ? That, in > essence, is what a > Virtual Router provides. > > Of course this is all being hashed out in the forums previously > mentioned, MEF, PPVPN and PWE3. > > _________ > Karl > > Karl Garcia > Sr. Mrkt. Engr. > CoSine Communications, Inc. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:raszuk@cisco.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:56 PM > To: Karl Garcia > Cc: Chrysostomos Tziouvaras; mpls-ops@mplsrc.com > Subject: Re: MPLS VPNs interconnection > > Hi Karl, > > Thx for your add but could you reference any draft specifically > talking > about interconnecting layer 2 VPNs with layer 3 VPNs for a service > provider ? I find such a possibility very interesting ... :). > > On the other hand I just want to make sure it is clear what are we > talking about in this thread. Is this about variuos ways customer can > access VPNs ie via leased lines, IPSec, FR/ATM, ethernet, GRE or other > > IP tunnel .... that is all very simple to do and in fact mutliple > vendors do it today (even Cisco world :). > > Or is this about creating parallel VPNs for the same customer one > Layer > 2 & the other Layer 3 and interconnecting them in the SP space. I > thought that was the qestion. And if I got it right I still think this > > is quite impossible. > > Rgs, > R. > > > Karl Garcia wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Well, Robert is right that this is not possible in the Cisco world. > > :-) > > > > However, not naming any names, there is equipment available today > > (actually shipping !) > > that can interconnect BGP/MPLS VPNs (layer 3), IPSec VPNs, FR and > ATM > > VPNs. In Q1 of 2002, this equipment will also support layer 2 MPLS > > VPNs. > > > > And it is built for the SP; that means it is carrier-class and > > scalable. > > > > Hope this helps, > > _______ > > Karl > > > > Karl Garcia > > Sr. Mrkt. Engr. > > CoSine Communications, Inc. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:raszuk@cisco.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:10 AM > > To: Chrysostomos Tziouvaras > > Cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com > > Subject: Re: MPLS VPNs interconnection > > > > I don't think this is possible on the SP side. > > > > Of course all of the below provide a concept of hub & spoke so at > the > > Hub side of your customer you could interconnect the VPNs as you > like. > > > > R. > > > > > Chrysostomos Tziouvaras wrote: > > > > > > Dear all, > > > can anyone provide me pointers to documentation about the > > interconnection > > > of VPNs that employ different technologies, such as layer 2 MPLS > > VPNs, > > > layer 3 MPLS VPNs and traditional VPNs (eg FR or ATM VPNs). > > > > > > Regards > > > Chrysostomos > > > > > > ------- > > > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List > > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml > > > Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml > > > > ------- > > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml > > Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml > > > ###################################################################################################### > > > This email communication may contain CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and is > > > intended only for the use of the intended recipients identified > > above. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, > > > you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy or print this email. If > > > you have received this communication in error, please immediately > > notify the sender by reply email, delete the communication and > destroy > > all copies. > > > ###################################################################################################### > > ###################################################################################################### > This email communication may contain CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and is > intended only for the use of the intended recipients identified > above. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, > you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy or print this email. If > you have received this communication in error, please immediately > notify the sender by reply email, delete the communication and destroy > all copies. > ###################################################################################################### ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
|
|