The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2001-Dec> msg00104



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

RE: MPLS load balancing

  • From: "asim khan" <rainron@hotmail.com>
  • Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 08:20:50 +0000
  • Cc: tpittman@frontrunner.eu.com, p.welcher@att.net, mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
  • Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 04:13:27 -0500
  • To: rcheung@slb.com, raszuk@cisco.com, asharma@interprovider.net
  • X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2001 08:20:53.0573 (UTC) FILETIME=[BB7A8F50:01C19041]
  • X-Originating-IP: [202.125.129.110]

hi Ray

could u plz explain how u resolved this problem

 

Regards

Asim

>From: Raymond Cheung
>Reply-To: rcheung@slb.com
>To: raszuk@cisco.com, Ayush Sharma
>CC: tpittman@frontrunner.eu.com, "''Peter J. Welcher' '" , mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
>Subject: RE: MPLS load balancing
>Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 00:25:20 -0600
>
>I've made them working with different IOS 12.2(2)T. I used 12.2(4)T1 for
>7206VXR and 12.0(19)ST1 for GSR.
>Since this is a new feature, I'm just trying to see if anyone could help. I
>doubt TAC would help you on lab testing, they probably would, but I'm glad I
>just make it working by myself.
>regards,
>Raymond
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:raszuk@cisco.com]
>Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:01 AM
>To: Ayush Sharma
>Cc: 'Raymond Cheung '; 'tpittman@frontrunner.eu.com '; ''Peter J.
>Welcher' '; 'mpls-ops@mplsrc.com '
>Subject: Re: MPLS load balancing
>
>
>
>In the mean time when you assing different RD - RR simply does not
>compare the routes and send vpnv4 updates received from PE1 as well as
>from PE2 for the same prefix to PE3 just fine. Something must be
>misconfigured as this works just fine.
>
>Complaining that this is broken will not help to troubleshoot the issue.
>Pls open a TAC case and they will help you,
>
>R.
>
> > Ayush Sharma wrote:
> >
> > Hi Raymond
> >
> > By using the path attribute on RRs (only on Cisco)would force RR to send
> > all available paths instead of sending the best path. It is new feature
>and
> > cisco claims to make it available in early next year.
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Ayush
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Raymond Cheung
> > To: tpittman@frontrunner.eu.com; 'Peter J. Welcher'; mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
> > Sent: 20/12/2001 18:05
> > Subject: RE: MPLS load balancing
> >
> > Peter,
> > Tim just explained exactly what I'm doing. Without RR in MPLS network, I
> > could have multipath for BGP if there are multiple IGP path to a PE.
> > With
> > RR, I can't make multipath work. Someone suggests using different RD for
> > same VPN (same route-target), but I can't make it working. I want to see
> > anyone have done this before.
> > best regards,
> > Raymond
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tim pittman [mailto:tpittman@frontrunner.eu.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 AM 11:10
> > To: 'Peter J. Welcher'; mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
> > Subject: RE: MPLS load balancing
> >
> > I think Rays issue is if a VPN destn. is actually reachable via two PE's
> > (PE1 and PE2).
> > eg a CE is dual homed to two PE's, PE1 and PE2.
> >
> > Then on PE3 because you can't iBGP load share via an RR, then only one
> > iBGP
> > route to the VPN destination (via either PE1 or PE2) is ever seen by
> > PE3.
> > The RR only passes on its best route.
> >
> > So doesn't matter that IGP on PE3 may then load share over differnet
> > internal paths
> > to reach either PE1 or PE2 , PE3 only ever sees one egress PE to reach
> > the
> > VPN destination.
> >
> > I guess iBGP load sharing without RR's would let PE3 see both PE1 and
> > PE2 as
> > equal
> > cost exit points and you could then use both, but don't think (with
> > cisco)
> > you can do it with RR's.
> >
> > tim
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter J. Welcher [mailto:p.welcher@att.net]
> > Sent: 20 December 2001 13:25
> > To: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
> > Subject: MPLS load balancing
> >
> > Hi, Ray. I may be missing what you're trying to do, but
> > I suspect from the CE-CE you're trying to load balance
> > for MPLS VPN's.
> >
> > If you're doing MPLS VPN, BGP / MBGP is only used for the
> > next hop (exit from the SP cloud) determination. If the next
> > hop is a loopback on the PE router, the IGP is used for path
> > to that loopback. The IGP should load balance equal cost routes,
> > and MPLS label paths will also do this.
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Raymond Cheung wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Has anyone tried BGP load balancing in a MPLS network with route
> > reflectors?
> > > I have no problem to get the load balancing working without route
> > > reflectors. But since route reflector can only advertise one best path
> > for
> > a
> > > prefix, so I have to use different RD to make vpnv4 addresses look
> > different
> > > on route reflectors. The problem is, after using different RD (still
> > same
> > > route-targets), CE-CE reachability is broken.
> > > Please let me know if you have done this..
> > > Much appreciated.
> > >
> > > best regards,
> > >
> > > Raymond Cheung
> > > Senior Network Engineer (CCIE R&S)
> > > Schlumberger Network Solutions
> > > Tel: 713-513-3285
> > > Tel: 713-513-3000
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Dr. Peter J. Welcher Home Office: (410) 626-7735 or 7122
> > CCIE #1773, CCSI 94014 e-FAX: (208) 567-2310
> > Chesapeake Netcraftsmen, Inc. EMAIL: pjw@netcraftsmen.net
> > 1290 Bay Dale Drive, #312 ALT EMAIL: p.welcher@att.net
> > Arnold, MD 21012-2325 //home.att.net/~p.welcher
> > CELL PHONE: (443) 995-4859
> >
> > Chesapeake Netcraftsmen is a new consulting company dedicated to
> > quality. It is formed of ex-Chesapeake Computer Consultant and
> > Mentor Technologies employees with deep consulting and training
> > experience. We are currently 6 CCIE's. Our expertise includes
> > high-end routing and design, VoIP, QoS, MPLS, network management,
> > security, IP multicast, and other areas.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > -------
> > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> > Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
> >
> > -------
> > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> > Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
> >
> > -------
> > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> > Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
> >
> > -------
> > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> > Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
>
>-------
>The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
>Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
>
>-------
>The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
>Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml


Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here
------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml