The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2001-Feb> msg00103



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: ISIS or OSPF?

  • From: Eric Osborne <eosborne@cisco.com>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:14:24 -0500
  • Cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
  • Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:30:17 -0500
  • To: Alan Claughan <alan@is.co.za>
  • User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
  • X-GPG-Fingerprint: 6412 0836 E440 B3EA 980C 4951 611E 1819 2E71 8562

On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 08:56:48PM +0200, Alan Claughan wrote:
> Cisco put the Traffic Engineering extensions into IS-IS first, so in the 
> early days of tag-switching IS-IS had to be used if TE was to be 
> configured. But these days both IS-IS and OSPF are supported. I would 
> advise sticking to the one you know and understand best!

Agreed.  From a cisco perspective, both IS-IS and OSPF are fully
supported.  Use the one you're familiar with, or whichever one fits
your needs.




eric

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml