The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] RE: ISIS or OSPF?
Hi all: there is another reason for selecting the IS-IS as IGP routing protocol is the interconnection between the cisco and juniper router for MPLS TE,if you select singel vendor in your network, both IS-IS and OSPF should work, but if you want to use both juniper and cisco in the same network for MPLS TE, then you must select the IS-IS . rgs/Wu Yong -----Original Message----- From: Eric Osborne [mailto:eosborne@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 5:14 AM To: Alan Claughan Cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com Subject: Re: ISIS or OSPF? On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 08:56:48PM +0200, Alan Claughan wrote: > Cisco put the Traffic Engineering extensions into IS-IS first, so in the > early days of tag-switching IS-IS had to be used if TE was to be > configured. But these days both IS-IS and OSPF are supported. I would > advise sticking to the one you know and understand best! Agreed. From a cisco perspective, both IS-IS and OSPF are fully supported. Use the one you're familiar with, or whichever one fits your needs. eric ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
|
|