The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] RE: loopback /32 mask
I also changed the mask to /30, and the tunnel is still set up. I also enable "ip ospf network point-to-point" under this loopback since OSPF advertises only host route for loopbacks no matter what mask is. I also rebooted the router, and the tunnel is still up. From the other P routers, /30 prefix did show up instead of /32. Then I changed the TE path from explicit path to dynamic path, the tunnel is torn down and then set up without any problems. I just don't understand why the /32 mask should be mandatory from some Cisco presentation. It looks like other masks work too. -----Original Message----- From: Raymond Cheung [mailto:rcheung@slb.com] Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 4:56 PM To: MPLS Mailing List Subject: loopback /32 mask Any particular reason for loopback to be /32 mask during RSVP-TE config? I understand it's good to have loopback as router id or headend, or ..., but my question is, is it mandatory that the mask should be /32? why other masks won't work? regards, ================================================ Yinglam (Raymond) Cheung Schlumberger Network Solutions CCIE (R/S), CCNP+ATM, CCDP Tel: (713) 513-3285 5599 San Felipe St Suite 400 Houston, TX 77056 Email: rcheung@slb.com ================================================ ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
|
|