The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: RSVP-TE draft support by Cisco and Juniper
> To my knowledge Cisco does not support draft 9. Not fully yet at least. Well to some extent you are correct. There are a few sections of the draft which we still working on. For example zero-bw CoS Tspec, Flowspec, and Adspec, or Session_Attribute type 1 with affinities .... > Will this not create interop problems? We participate in all interops and provide fixes when peer seems to be complient and we are not :). If you have any specific interoperability issue pls let me or somebody else from MPLS IOS developemnt know about it. Rgs, R. > winbun@linuxplanet.nu wrote: > > >Hi, > > > Anyone knows if Cisco and Juniper supports > > draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel-09.txt? If yes, > > in which software release? > > > Mainly interested in Section 2.3 (Service Classes), > > the Null Service (which replaces the COS service > > as described in draft-07). Any of their releases > > still support the COS service SENDER_TSPEC and > > FLOWSPEC objects? > > >Thanks, > >S. Leung > > To my knowledge Cisco does not support draft 9. Not yet atleast. Not sure about > Juniper. I have tried setting up BE tunnels with Null TSPEC and found that > Cisco does not support this(12.1(ST) I think). Also Cisco treats flowspec as > optional. Will this not create interop problems? Robert Raszuk can provide > more clarification, I hope. > > W. Inbun > > -- > Get your firstname@lastname email for FREE at http://Nameplanet.com/?su > > ------- > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml > Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
|
|