The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: NAT on PE router
Because the guy said it was an extraNet!!! >From: "alok" <alok.dube@apara.com> >To: "Ridolfi Stefano" <s_ridolfi@yahoo.it>, "sylvia" ><sylvia_xys@hotmail.com>, <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com> >Subject: Re: [MPLS-OPS]: NAT on PE router >Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:29:58 +0530 > >...a client asking for 2 VPNs ...would obviously mean IP addresses overlap. > >why 2 VPNs is a better question...... i guess... if u dont mind me asking.. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ridolfi Stefano > To: alok ; sylvia ; mpls-ops@mplsrc.com > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:14 PM > Subject: Re: [MPLS-OPS]: NAT on PE router > > > Because we have a client whit 2 VPNs and IP address overlapped > > > > alok <alok.dube@apara.com> wrote: > > the concept is fine, can u give me a specific application? > > why not simply use public internet IPs for those places we need to >NAT? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ridolfi Stefano > To: sylvia ; mpls-ops@mplsrc.com > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:38 PM > Subject: Re: [MPLS-OPS]: NAT on PE router > > > In VRF A there aren't original IP address of B (or C) but the IP >address cofigured for NAT in B (or C). > > VRF in B (or C) advertise NOT original IP but only NAT pool IP >Address ! > > > > sylvia <sylvia_xys@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Ridolfi, > > Yes, it is possible that the traffics are only between A-B and >A-C. >But, if B and C have the same IP space, when a terminal in A want to send a >packet to 10.0.0.2, how can it tells it's the 10.0.0.2 in B or 10.0.0.2 in >C? It has no idea of VPN. > > Sylvia > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ridolfi Stefano > To: sylvia ; mpls-ops@mplsrc.com > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:08 PM > Subject: Re: [MPLS-OPS]: NAT on PE router > > > Hi Sylvia, > > for extranet service we have 3 VPNs; VPN A is the central >office, >B and C are 2 branch , and 2 VPNs whit same IP space; it's possible only >the traffic A-B, and A-C; In the VRFof VPN A is not possible to have the >same network for VPNs B and C. > > The idea is to use NAT in B or C and to advertise the NAT Pool >from B or C to A. > > By > > > > sylvia <sylvia_xys@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry, what do you mean by "natting IP between 2 VPN"? > > The private IP addresses are seen only inside VPNs. One VPN >has >no any idea about the IP address in the other VPN. > For the PE router, it only knows VPN-IPV4 address family. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ridolfi Stefano > To: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:21 AM > Subject: [MPLS-OPS]: NAT on PE router > > > Hi all, > > Is it possible to use NAT feature for natting IP between 2 >VPN >? > > Any idea about the restriction on cisco site:"Inside VPN to >VPN with NAT is not supported" ? > > > > rgds > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------ > Yahoo! Cartoline: invia i tuoi auguri di Natale agli amici > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Yahoo! Cartoline: invia i tuoi auguri di Natale agli amici > > > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Yahoo! Cartoline: invia i tuoi auguri di Natale agli amici > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >-- > Yahoo! Cartoline: invia i tuoi auguri di Natale agli amici _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
|
|